CLINICAL EVIDENCE

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Original source: QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

Original source publication date:

QUADAS-2 separates risk of bias from applicability in diagnostic evidence assessment.

What the paper explores

The QUADAS-2 paper describes a revised tool organized around patient selection, the index test, the reference standard, and flow and timing. It uses signaling questions to guide judgments about bias and, for the relevant domains, concerns about applicability to the review question.

How to interpret the evidence

The tool requires judgments tailored to a defined question. A checklist response should not be collapsed into an unsupported claim that a study is universally reliable.

Questions for MedTech teams

When reviewing diagnostic literature, distinguish an internally credible result from evidence that actually matches your product’s intended population and clinical setting.

Sources & further reading

Read original paper

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

Bibliographic record and abstract on PubMed

This is a short editorial reading note on external research. The original research is attributed to its authors and does not represent an HMC study, product validation or regulatory determination.

Back to all resources
CONTACT HMC

Discuss your study
or regulatory submission.

Tell us your product type, target market,
and the support you need.

Contact HMC
Hands using an office telephone, from the original HMC website

Ready to learn more about working with us?

CONTACT USCHAT WITH US